Vehicle Crime ReductionWed, September 19, 2001Source: Joanna Sallybanks and Rick BrownVehicle Crime Reduction: Turning The Corner Policing & Reducing Crime Briefing NoteBackground In
September 1998, the Prime Minister announced a national target to reduce vehicle
crime by 30% over five years. The Vehicle Crime Reduction Action Team (VCRAT), a
multi-agency group formed by the Home Office in 1998 to oversee vehicle crime
work, has been tasked with co-ordinating efforts to achieve the 30% reduction
target. One of the first actions of VCRAT was to commission a review of research
and statistics relevant to the target. This
report provides findings from that review. It examines international, national
and local police force patterns of vehicle crime and highlights some of the key
issues that will need to be addressed if the 30% target is to be
achieved. Main findings Vehicle
crime trends England
and Wales are commonly held up as the ‘Car Crime Capital of Europe’. The
evidence for this, however, is the subject of debate - definitions of a vehicle
theft differ across European states. Analysis of European police statistics
found that rates of vehicle theft in Denmark and Sweden were higher than in the
UK. However, the 1996 International Victimisation Survey, reporting risk of
theft of and from cars across 11 countries, shows England and Wales to suffer
the highest risk of theft. In
1997, over 1.1 million vehicle crime offences were reported to the police and
estimates from victimization surveys suggest the true figure may be closer to
2.5 million offences. Approximately a quarter of all recorded crime is
vehicle-related and the overall rate was estimated to be 22 recorded vehicle
crime offences per 1,000 licensed vehicles. While recorded vehicle crime
increased rapidly in the late 1980s / early 1990s, it declined by 28% between
1992 and 1997. In
1997, over 400,000 vehicles were reported stolen. Estimates suggest that 81% of
these were cars, nine percent were motorcycles, nine percent were light
commercial vehicles and one percent were heavy goods vehicles. The majority of
stolen vehicles, however, were recovered (69%). Thefts
from vehicles accounted for 63% of recorded vehicle crime offences, but are
significantly under-reported. The British Crime Survey (BCS) estimates that over
2 million thefts from vehicles occurred in 1997. In 1997, rates of vehicle crime
at the police force level ranged from 5 to 33 per 1,000 head of
population. Forces
with a low rate of vehicle crime tended to be situated in more rural areas,
while high vehicle crime areas tended to contain large conurbations, synonymous
with higher levels of crime. Thefts
of cars The
types of car most at risk of theft are older (more than five years old),
sportier versions of familiar high volume models. Analysis of the 1997 Car Theft
Index showed that just 38 models accounted for 19% of stolen
vehicles. Car
security was found to have improved significantly on new models in recent years.
Although there is some evidence to show that new security works, the evidence is
still weak and further work on both long-term effectiveness and retro-fit
security is required. Inner city areas, council
estates and areas with a high level of physical disorder all suffer
disproportionately high levels of car crime. Where specific parking locations
are concerned, public car parks present a particularly high risk, while domestic
garages provide the best protection. Those with a high risk of victimisation of
car theft include the young, those on low incomes, the
unemployed and single parents. Thefts from
cars Items most
frequently stolen from cars are external parts (e.g. wheel trims, badges,
hubcaps), followed by stereo equipment, bags, briefcases and cameras etc. Thefts
from cars also tend to be focused on the poorest areas (council estates,
low-income and multi-ethnic areas are particularly at risk). However, those
earning in excess of £30,000 pa were more likely than others to be a victim of a
theft from a vehicle. Points for action An effective
vehicle crime reduction strategy needs a clear understanding of the nature of
the problem in order to tailor solutions appropriately. This requires detailed
analysis, at both the national and local level, to identify the scope for action
against vehicles, locations, victims or offenders. Constant monitoring of the
strategy will also be essential so that it can be refined as required, and
effective crime reduction methods promoted as examples of good
practice. Specific points for
action arising from this report include: Vehicles
Locations
Victim groups
Offender
groups
|
|