Arresting Evidence: Domestic ViolenceWed, September 19, 2001Source: Jalna Hanmer, Sue Griffiths and Dave JerwoodArresting Evidence: Domestic Violence And Repeat Victimisation Policing & Reducing Crime Briefing NoteSummary This
project is part of a continuing programme of
research and development on policing responses to repeat victimisation. The
aim was to reduce repeated domestic violence by adopting a graded response to
incidents in the Killingbeck Division of West Yorkshire Police. An extended
briefing note (1/98) was published in April 1998 describing the project and
setting out the findings from the first six months. This paper presents findings
from the first full year of the project, and discusses the operational issues
involved in implementing and monitoring such initiatives. The
model The
project builds on the force domestic violence policy - to arrest whenever
possible, to gather evidence as with any other crime, and to ensure the safety
of the victim. It involves grading responses to domestic violence incidents
according to the number of times the police have attended the offender in the
past year. At its simplest, a first police attendance triggers a Level 1
response, a second a Level 2 and a third a Level 3. However, in assessing the
initial level of response, the full police record is reviewed along with
information from the woman on previous unreported assaults, and entry at higher
levels may be required. The main premise is that an increase in incidents
prompts an increase in activity by the police and other agencies. This activity
is directed at both victims and offenders, and takes account of whether the
offence is common law or criminal and whether the woman is living with or
separated from the perpetrator. Main findingsThe
project reduced repeat attendances To
assess the model’s effectiveness, the level of domestic violence attendances in
1997 was compared with a three-month period in 1996 before the project began.
The aim was to reduce the number of attendances at Levels 2 and above. Table 1
shows that the numbers of men entering the project at Levels 2 and 3 are
significantly reduced since the project began. During April to June 1996
(pre-project period) Level 1 entries were less frequent and Levels 2 and 3 more
frequent than during the project. The proportion of attendances that were
one-off, for example, increased from 66% to 85%. The change at each level is
progressive over each quarter of 1997, suggesting that implementation of the
model improved over the year. Over
the year more women received police assistance Table
1 also shows that the overall number of incidents remained constant but with
more Level 1 entries, suggesting that more women are reporting incidents to the
police. Over time, if repeat attendance continues to be effectively prevented,
we would expect to see overall numbers of incidents reduce. Even with stable
incidence numbers, however, there is a saving in police resources as Level 1
interventions require less time to be spent on responding to domestic violence
calls than Levels 2 and 3. Early
intervention reduces repeat attendances The
main report shows that early intervention achieves the greatest reduction in
repeat attendances. Level 1 entrants have the lowest proportion of
re-attendances, with three-quarters (75%) not requiring a second attendance in
1997, compared to 54% of Level 2 entrants and 36% of Level 3. The percentage of
Level 1 entrants requiring two or three or more attendances was consistently
less than those at the other levels. This
indicates that introducing the first intervention at Level 2 or 3 is not as
effective as first intervention at Level 1. The most likely reasons for this are
either that the offender has become desensitised or
has concluded that the police do not object to his behaviour or
both. There is also evidence that recording individual repeat patterns in this
way allows the identification of the small number of chronic repeat offenders
who the project has not been able to demotivate.
Police and other agencies can then begin to develop tailored responses,
targeting specialist services where they are most needed.try
level of men by quarterly time periods The
time interval between calls for assistance increased The
project demonstrates greater time intervals between repeat attendance than that
shown by earlier research, where 35% of households required a second attendance
within five weeks. In Killingbeck, within five weeks, 9% who entered at Level 1
were attended again; of those requiring Level 2 and 3 interventions, 15% and 26%
were attended again within five weeks. The
recording of domestic violence incidents improved West
Yorkshire Police has an independent database for recording domestic violence
incidents – the Domestic Violence Index (DVI). When the project began, a daily
manual check of all calls received at Killingbeck was undertaken and all
attendances that appeared to be ‘domestic’, irrespective of their final codes,
were cross- checked with the DVI. This found that only 50% of attendances were
allocated a domestic FIN-code when attendances were finalised.
With intensive follow-up and improved awareness amongst attending officers and
control room staff, by the end of the year the recording rate had increased to
80%. Points for
action The
Killingbeck experience demonstrates the benefits to be gained from adopting a
strategic approach to domestic violence at the local level. The new Crime and
Disorder partnerships offer an infrastructure for delivering an effective
response to victims and offenders. In developing their local strategies,
consideration should be given to the following issues: Recording
practices - systems
need to be put in place to allow accurate identification of repeats, both to
enable rapid appropriate interventions and for monitoring purposes. For the
police, this may involve developing common definitions of ‘domestic’ and
consistent use of final codes. Asking the victim about previous unreported
assaults can inform the development of an effective response. To gain a picture
of the extent of domestic violence in a local area, police records can be
supplemented by data from other sources, for example women’s refuges, GPs,
Accident and Emergency departments and local surveys of women. Graded
response - a
graded response is simply a way of organising
existing resources in a systematic, planned way, matching the level of response
to the level of risk. The precise measures will vary according to what is
available in the local area. While the levels of intervention are set, there
should be room for discretion. If a first attack is particularly serious, for
example, you may want to implement a measure from a higher level such as a panic
alarm. Training
- training
should be a key part of the strategy. In Killingbeck, to prepare for the
project, all officers received face-to-face training that aimed to
increase their understanding of domestic violence and its potential consequences
and to convey the project rationale, its interventions and their role within it.
Initial training should be supplemented with ongoing updates and feedback
sessions. Cross-agency training can help to improve awareness of each agency’s
roles and responsibilities. Inter-agency
working - a wide range of
agencies and organisations need to be involved in an effective response to
domestic violence, and early consultation before any initiative can help to
improve ‘ownership’. Attention should be given to improved communication flows
and information sharing within and between agencies. Performance
indicators - it is widely
recognized that domestic violence is under-reported. Encouraging increased
reporting should be a key aim of any initiative and forces should expect the
overall number of recorded incidents to increase in the short term. This should
be reflected in the development of local performance indicators to ensure that
they do not act as a disincentive. Monitoring the patterns of attendances over
time is a useful indicator of effectiveness. In the short term, the aim is to
reduce repeat attendance and increase one-off attendances, resulting in stable
or increasing calls overall. At some point, saturation may be reached, as there
is not a limitless supply of men who require police attendance (and /or women
who require police assistance). When every woman who requires attendance
receives it and if repeat attendance continues to be effectively prevented, we
would expect to see overall numbers of incidents decrease. |
|