PoliceOracle.com

Police Watchdog: Pursuit Probe Terms Outlined

Police Watchdog: Pursuit Probe Terms Outlined

IPCC outlines terms of independent investigation into the management of a police pursuit in London.

Date - 7th February 2012
Courtesy of - IPCC
5 Comments 5 Comments}

The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has outlined the Terms of Reference for the independent investigation following a police pursuit that preceded a road traffic incident in Penge, London.

At about 23:20 hours on Friday, January 13, 2012 an unmarked police vehicle noticed two cars travelling at what the officers’ claim were excess speeds on Samos Road. One vehicle was lost but an attempt was made to stop the other vehicle, a Mini Cooper, at the junction with Croydon Road.

The pursuit continued with a further attempt to stop the Mini, driven by a man, in Lennard Road, London SE20.

Following the attempt, the Mini drove off and shortly afterwards collided with another vehicle after the junction with Kent House Road.

Following the collision Emergency Services attended the scene and the driver of the Mini was taken to Kings College Hospital, London, where his condition deteriorated and he subsequently died.

The driver of the other vehicle, a woman, received minor injuries.

The independent investigation is looking at the Metropolitan Police Service’s (MPS) management of the pursuit conducted by the Command and Control Centre responsible for controlling the incident. The investigation is examining the extent of the communications between the officers involved in the pursuit and the control room staff responsible for monitoring and recording the incident.

It is also looking at the extent of the initial phase assessment conducted by the Command and Control Centre Pan London Supervisor in line with the relevant standard operating procedures. Finally, the investigation is probing the extent of the decision making process conducted by the Command and Control Centre Pan London Supervisor in line with the relevant standard operating procedures.

The family is aware of our investigation.

IPCC Commissioner Mike Franklin said: "A young man has tragically lost his life following this pursuit and we owe it to his family to thoroughly and independently investigate the command and control aspect of the pursuit prior to his death.

"It is my duty to ensure our independent investigation focuses on the MPS management of the police pursuit, conducted by the Command and Control Centre, which had responsibility for controlling the incident.

“Further, we need to be confident, where appropriate, lessons are learned as a result of this fatal incident. In addition to providing independent scrutiny I will be looking to make further recommendations, if necessary, for forces to consider when engaging in police pursuits.”

Do you have an interesting news story? Contact the newsdesk on 01737 648 432
or alternatively get in touch via the contact form.

Categories and Tags

Anonymous Anonymous says...
ian

ian - Tue, 07 February 2012
"It is my duty to ensure our independent investigation focuses on the MPS management of the police pursuit etc"".Seems to me the IPCC also need to focus on the Mini driver who had the option to stop.Also that if Franklin is" looking to make further recommendations" he seems to have already decided what happened and whose fault it was. Luckily the innocent woman involved was not seriously injured and will be able to tell the IPCC about the totally irresponsible actions of the mini driver.
ReportReply

Juswebster

Juswebster - Thu, 09 February 2012
the driver of the mini had two options
1. stop for the police as required in law
2. not stop and suffer the consequences
he chose the latter. end of lesson and a learning curve people should consider when running from the police
ReportReply

Maverick22

Maverick22 - Mon, 13 February 2012
Sorry, am I missing the point here. An idiot driver fails to stop during a pursuit and manages to kill himself. The IPCC come out with their usual platitudes to the family, but nothing said to the officers(they don't matter =as far as the IPCC is concerned.) If the IPCC had any grit, they would issue a quick statment saying, ''all the driver had to do was stop and there would be nothing to investigate'', end of story.
ReportReply

Maverick22

Maverick22 - Mon, 13 February 2012
There is one lesson all these idiots could learn, when requested to stop by the police. STOP.
ReportReply

Anonymous

Anonymous - Tue, 14 February 2012
As usual the IPCC's primary concern is with looking to criticize the police officers actions. Despite these incidents happening on a regular basis I have never once heard them publicly criticize the actions of the person who was driving the car that failed to stop. The simple fact is if the driver had stopped when the police requested him to do so there would not have been any loss of life, the most fortunate outcome of this is that the innocent lady driver has only sustained minor injury and will hopefully make a fully recovery.
Perhaps we should have a national ban on pursuits so the criminals can run amock and see how long it is before the public complain that the police are not doing their jobs. Although if ths were the case the IPCC would be happy as none of the criminals would hurt themselves.
ReportReply